Skip to main content

Statistics from St Andrews Research Repository

This page provides context to the statistics shared with our academic community on usage of our Open Access content from the University of St Andrews Research Repository.

See below for the most recent statistics
Archived statistics updates can be found on the Repository.

Total downloads to date

We draw our download statistics from IRUS-UK "a standards-based statistics aggregation service for repositories in the UK, enabling them to share and compare usage statistics using the COUNTER standard." (https://www.jisc.ac.uk/irus). This service provides consistent, comparable and trustworthy usage data. For more information about IRUS-UK, visit http://irus.mimas.ac.uk/

We provide a headline figure showing the total number of downloads for all content that is publicly available (open access) from St Andrews Research Repository, since we joined IRUS-UK in 2014.

Monthly downloads

In each report we show the most recent monthly downloads, dividing the content into 2 main types - Research publications and Theses - to reflect the scope of the repository. We can see a general trend of around 20,000 downloads per month. Occasional spikes can be seen where individual items may have received exceptionally high attention. We can drill down further into these figures through the IRUS-UK Portal, and we have plans to embed these statistics into item pages within the repository.

Content in the repository

We also measure the amount of content currently available as open access, so you can see the number of items that have been made freely available by our researchers. Publications (including articles, conference proceedings, working papers, reports, books and chapters) are primarily deposited via the institution's Research Information System (Pure). E-theses are deposited directly into the repository and become open access after any agreed embargo period.

These high level figures show us that our e-theses receive a relatively high level of usage, probably due to the fact that the repository is the primary source for these items. Versions of most research publications are available in addition to published versions, which will always be referenced in the associated item metadata.

We welcome any feedback or comment on Your Open Access.

Latest statistics:


Loading...

Loading...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your Open Access - statistics and usage

It's Open Access Week again, and this year the theme is 'Open in order to...' This year's theme is designed to shift discussion away from wider issues of 'openness', and instead direct attention to the tangible benefits of open access. This week we will be publishing a series of posts aimed at  highlighting some of these benefits. In this post we will look at some of the statistics we gather about the open access content in our Repository, and specifically the statistics that we've chosen to highlight in our new Infographic.
Given the theme of this year's Open Access Week, the subject of this post could be appropriately described as 'Open in order to boost downloads' For years we have been collecting usage statistics about the content held in our repository. Up until now this data has been collected and, for the most part, discussed internally; but not any more. Now we want to show the academic community here in St Andrews, whose work populates …

The Great Science Publishing Scandal

For centuries academic journals have been the custodians of scientific knowledge. But in the past few decades this has become increasingly contentious, as publishers continue to boast high profit margins, and their customers, largely academic libraries, continue to face squeezed budgets. Some libraries have cancelled subscriptions, some countries have been in deadlocked negotiations with publishers for months and even years, and many researchers have resorted to illegal means to access research.

But how did it get this way? And is there anything that can be done? In the BBC Radio 4 programme 'The Great Science Publishing Scandal' Matthew Cobb, Professor of Zoology at the University of Manchester, discusses the history leading up to the current crisis, and looks at the ways in which academia can change to redress the balance of power in academic publishing. One such change advocated by professor Cobb is to break the link between prestige journals and academic promotion, and an…

Open Access books: Tony Crook's new book is published OA

This week is Open Access week, and the theme is set to look at the foundational work that is needed to underpin a transition to a world where research results are free and open by default. Recent moves by the open access publisher Knowledge Unlatched have shone a spot light on the need for better cooperation in achieving an open access default for books. Where KU has gone in the direction of commercial proprietary infrastructure, others such as Open Book Publishers have called for more open and transparent cooperation that isn't tied to proprietary commercially driven software. Open Book Publisher's reaction to Knowledge Unlatched is here.

"Academics need to know that there are benefits too, and that the expense of publishing OA is worth it in the long run"
While the debate about the nature of the infrastructure rumbles on, presently we must keep our minds focussed on the individual examples of open access books. Indeed the appetite for open access books is unlikely…