Skip to main content

Open in Action conversations

As described in our last post, the theme of this year's Open Access Week 'Open in Action' was all about taking concrete steps to open up research and scholarship and encouraging others to do the same.



With this in mind, the Library invited all researchers to join their OA experts at a range of drop-in sessions. To share the outcomes of these conversations even further, we have listed the most commonly asked questions here along with the support available from the Open Access team and colleagues.

The main themes discussed so far have been:

Focus on ‘acceptance’

The key message is to ‘act on acceptance’ and deposit all articles and proceedings in Pure (the University’s research system) along with the full date of acceptance. Most authors find this easiest to do in the active period following acceptance, and most publishers allow accepted versions (not published pdfs) to be made open access by this route. See our web page for a 2 minute 'deposit demo'.

Not just for REF

Making your work Open is not just about compliance with REF policies. The University expects staff to deposit ALL articles in Pure, not just those you expect to submit to REF. This is not only because we don't yet know the shape of the next REF, but that we want to give visibility to all research outputs. Researchers can add all kinds of research publications and activities in Pure, and make links with their projects and underlying data. The Library provides integrated support on using Pure – contact the Pure Helpdesk for advice or training.
 

The cost of Open Access

Most publishers offer a paid route to Open Access, known as the ‘gold’ route. Except for a few cases where research funders prefer this route, the good news is you don’t have to pay extra for making your work open in traditional journals. Use the ‘green’ route, and all it costs is a few minutes of your time to deposit in Pure.

'Open in Action' conversations: Questions and answers 

 

Q: does my publisher allow open access after I deposit in Pure?

Almost always the answer is "Yes", though there may be conditions. You are normally permitted to deposit your author-created accepted version following peer-review, but not proofs or published versions. There might also be an embargo period before the deposited version can be made Open. Don't worry, the Library will take care of this provided you deposit on acceptance!

Q: do I have to do this for everything?

As mentioned above - you should deposit ALL articles in Pure, not just those you expect to submit to REF. Open Access is not just for Christmas (or REF)!
You can choose to make other outputs such as book chapters Open Access, provided we can get permission from publishers - contact us for advice.

Q: what information do I need to add in Pure? 

Fill in the mandatory fields when creating a record, and make sure to add the full date of acceptance for articles and proceedings. When you upload a file, set the document version as 'accepted author manuscript' and choose access as 'Open'. You can also link any projects or underlying data under 'Relations'. The Library will enhance the records and take care of the rest.

Q: can you explain more about the date of acceptance?

Yes we can! In short: once peer review stages are complete, 'date of acceptance' is when you are made aware that all academically necessary changes have been made in response to reviewer comments. Hefce has published official advice. There are many queries around this, and a call to the OA team might be the best way to resolve them. The key thing is to decide on the most appropriate date and add it in Pure.

Q: do I have to pay for Open Access?

There is no charge for depositing in Pure - the 'green' route to OA. You are not expected to pay for OA to be compliant with the REF OA Policy. There will only be a charge if you have chosen a fully open access journal that charges APCs rather than subscriptions, or if your funder has stricter requirements that means you need to choose the 'gold' route.

Q: I chose 'Gold' OA, do I still need to deposit in Pure?

Yes - you need to deposit your article in Pure in all cases, so please deposit the accepted version as soon as possible. This makes sure we can report effectively and provide advice as early as possible. In the case of articles with Creative Commons licences, we will be able to make the final version Open Access.

Q: Will deposit in Pure meet my funder's requirements?

Not always. Certain funders such as MRC, EU (Horizon2020) and Wellcome Trust have strict limits on embargo periods and a preference for immediate Open Access. In some cases we can provide help with funding to pay APCs, or you may be able to use your grant - see more on research funder's policies.

Q: Can you tell me more about the content I can put in Pure, and how this makes research outputs more visible?

The best way to find out more about Pure is to check the Pure web pages or contact the Pure Helpdesk for advice or training. Pure provides web services to make content available from School web pages as well as the main Research Portal.


If you have additional questions - or want to arrange a drop-in specially for your School or department, get in touch with us at openaccess@st-andrews.ac.uk

Meanwhile, get into the OA habit so you can benefit from the wide audience your work deserves!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We've now reached 8000 items in our repository!

Last week the St Andrews Research Repository reached a new milestone: 8000 items!

The last major content milestone we celebrated was when we reached 5000 items, this was back in February 2015. The blog post we wrote in recognition of this mentioned that the upsurge in activity was largely down to research funders and HEFCE (the folks behind the Research Excellence Framework) requiring authors to self-archive their publications. 17 months on and this trend is continuing.

In April 2016 the Research Excellence Framework open access policy came into effect (to find out more read our previous blog post). This means that to ensure compliance with the policy authors must deposit their accepted manuscripts for journal articles and conference proceedings into the University's research information system (Pure). To ensure all St Andrews researchers are aware of the policy we have been working hard to deliver the message: 'Act on acceptance: deposit in Pure'. This slogan, which is em…

Open Access is here! Make sure you are ready

Open Access is now an essential feature of scholarly communications. As well as maximising visibility of the University’s research outputs, Open Access is now a requirement of many funders. It is also critical for ensuring eligibility for submission of journal articles and conference proceedings to the next Research Excellence Framework (REF).

The Policy for open access in the post-2014 Research Excellence Framework is in force from April 1 2016, and states "to be eligible for submission to the next REF, authors’ final peer-reviewed manuscripts must have been deposited in an institutional or subject repository". For St Andrews, this means that all researchers must deposit the accepted version of journal articles and conference proceedings in Pure as soon after acceptance as possible. In common with other institutions, the Library has been promoting the message ‘Act on acceptance: deposit in Pure’. This applies not just for REF and all authors should deposit their manuscripts…

Tickell report positive on the future of Open Access in the UK

Following the Burgess Review of Research Councils UK Open Access Policy and RCUK’s response, this report considers the wider scope of UK Open Access generally and how scholarly publishing markets and the policy landscape are developing including Open Data.

The advice was provided by Professor Adam Tickell, the respected Provost and Vice-Principal, University of Birmingham and Chair of Universities UK (UUK) Open Access Coordination Group.

Its main conclusion was positive on progress to date:
Open Access to research continues to be a public benefit and the UK remains a world leader. Research Councils UK should continue to support Gold Open Access charges. 
However, some changes are suggested in the recommendations.

Some key recommendations:
Universities should be encouraged to sign up to the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) UUK Open Access Coordination Group to support the development of agreed service standards around Gold UK Open Access policy should offer gr…